"This claim is harmful and offensive." - Former Bar examinerATTY. PHIL JURISSep 23, 20231 min readRated 0 out of 5 stars.No ratings yet"As an examiner last year, I took my job so seriously. I read every single answer and spent so many hours doing so. There was no assistance whatsoever from anyone, especially not from AI. This claim is harmful and offensive."✍️ JoanDeVenecia📸: https://pxl.to/ATTYPhilJuris
"As an examiner last year, I took my job so seriously. I read every single answer and spent so many hours doing so. There was no assistance whatsoever from anyone, especially not from AI. This claim is harmful and offensive."✍️ JoanDeVenecia📸: https://pxl.to/ATTYPhilJuris
The application of the principle 'Ignorantia legis neminem excusat' presupposes that the law has been duly published-SC
SC: "Criminal liability for Estafa is not affected by payment.."Indeed, the long-standing general rule is that criminal liability for Estafa is not affected by payment, indemnification, reimbursement...
SC Dismisses Personnel for Dual Employment and Double Compensation with SC and PNP“Where a conflict of interest exists, may reasonably appear to exist, or where the outside employment reflects adversely on the integrity...
コメント